Virtual Systems Let the world see what you've built. It plays PCM and may not do high res. ) Reel-to-reel can be better, but tapes are fragile and rare, then the players have been out of production for decades and require expensive maintenance from. If the SACD editions of The Police's albums were mastered from the original first-generation master tapes then they might sound better than the vinyl editions, as the original LPs were more than likely mastered from LP master tapes. Like Dark Side, this is a defining record not only for the artist but for a genre of music. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. 1447) Join Date Dec 2011 Location Tynemouth, England Posts 2,457 Mentioned 43 Post(s)SACD vs. Updated on January 6, 2021 Although pre-recorded CDs have lost luster with the convenience of digital music streaming and downloads, the CD started the digital music. SACD vs. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. #2. There isn't an answer as to what sounds better it really is just personal preference. Yesterday I received a Holiday Specials brochure from Music Direct and on the back cover is the 2LP vinyl set that Ralphie discussed in his post HERE. Although this recording was digital, the Parsons 2017 remaster actually sounds more analogue than the original cd. SHM-SACD vs UK Vinyl. Vinyl, ASL AQ-1005 DT vs. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. The best of both worlds is vinyl ripped on a very high end rig in High res and then converted to DSD. Music shouldn't be encoded at a bitrate lower than 128 kbps, or it will sound pretty lifeless. Data read from an SHM CD is no different to the data red from an ordinary CD. Consequently, the Super Audio CD (SACD) was developed by Philips and Sony. The fact that the DSD pulse train VISUALLY happens to look more like the analog signal than the string of binary numbers that result from PCM encoding is meaningless - since both must be converted to analog audio anyway. I've heard many great sounding redbook cd's and I've heard some horrible vinyl. I have two completely different setups for vinyl, and digital, and my vinyl is always a little more bass and drums heavy, past that, no glaring differences. Vinyl. The individual versions will be available on September 16, 2022 with the Deluxe version available from October 7, 2022. 4 restitution, but in binaural, this version does not follow the fineness and the presence of the stereo vinyl and SACD versions. After purchasing The Cars S/T, Candy-O, and Shake It Up on MFSL vinyl, here are my thoughts. Tony Plachy, Jan 7, 2015. The OP asked specifically if an SHM-Platinum CD sounds better than the redbook layer of a Hybrid-SACD. Plan9 Mastering Engineer. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. . I think SACD has the best audio fidelity of any medium I have ever heard to date. Mono audio was the first of all the (analog) audio formats and formed the basis for radio and analog TV for many years; including vinyl records. Bluebook The right price. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. The higher resolution of the blu ray might also explain the audible tape hiss not heard on the cd. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. but for every song, the DR value is "one less" on the SACD vs CD. We specialize in vinyl records and turntables. The most notable proof of this is the CD4 quadraphonic system which relied on a 45 kHz bandwidth. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Los Angeles, CA. The 16/44. New media New comments Browse Albums Search media. I’ve already evaluated Grundman’s mastering of Can’t Buy a Thrill in a Mini-TBVO on my blog, and I plan to evaluate every AP remaster as part of a mini or full. Animals is a concept album, focusing on the social-political conditions of mid-1970s Britain, and was a change from the style of the band's earlier work. On the vinyl, the violin and the acoustic rhythm guitar lay back a bit, and there's a slightly rounded-off, woody tone to the drumming and the bass, and a very, very subtle tunneled, recessed quality to the vocals. The real difference between various releases is the quality of the mastering. . " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. Some vinyl is very quiet while others are not . 2. #1. Tip about the 1812, the first cannon shot is the toughest of the lot to track, that one is a beastie (the Shure V 15 Type IV mounted on a SME III tonearm came closest in the day, or the Audio-Technica 440 ML). The "Mastertape" version though more detailed and seemingly purer sounds flatter in eq. I don't know which is more truthful. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me. Sucks that there's no general concensus as to which CD is better, aside from the SACD. My reluctance in getting a transport has many reasons, the main being my investment in vinyl, but I did need to find a link to my CDs. I have a feeling the vinyl will sound better. On a CD, the separation between the left and right channels used in recording is over 90 dB. vinyl debate ultimately comes down to personal preference and the listening experience you seek. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. I can't believe there's any real debate over MFSL SACD vs. Tell me what you think, do you prefer SACD's or Vinyls because they sound the same to me, only you get the 5. SACD's can tend to have better mastering and transfer than standard CD releases of the same album. Vinyl: SACD offers digital precision, while vinyl provides analog warmth and character. (Warner 3010-2, mastering credit: Perry, Caillat) for 9. 1 option. SACD vs. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Page 2 of 2 < Prev 1 2. The MoFi vinyl is a real eye-opener. I just listened closely to the MFSL SACD, the noises are audible at the end of every track. Australia. I don't know which is more truthful. I grew up in the analogue days (vinyl and tape) so tape hiss is to be expected on recordings. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. What you're saying about DACs, i. Even better than the regular SACD with even clearer presentation. The Beethoven symphony cycle on LSO Live (Haitink, 2006) is an SACD hybrid set. Packaging: Nicest packaging and faithful reproduction of the original album. CD. Perfect music with one of Mozart’s greatest interpreters with the greatest orchestra. In the vinyl vs. Sign in with Google Even the standard redbook CD (44kHz, 16 bit resolution) has about a 26dB advantage to vinyl with respect to dynamic range, and at least a 40-50 dB advantage in stereo separation as well as unmeasurable wow and flutter. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. Tony van Veen is the CEO of DIY Media Group, the parent company of Disc Makers and BookBaby. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. An XRCD is just a redbook CD that goes through a special mastering process, usually at 20 or 24 bit, as apposed to a standard redbook CD that is mastered at 16 bits (the XRCD's are converted down to 16 bit at the end of the mastering process in order to retain compatibility with redbook standard). I did the comparison via my Stax Lambda Pro headphone system (which can be quite revealing). cporcp, Jun 28, 2021 #7. One is the MFSL version which I loved. Please login or registerlogin or registerThe primary difference noted between the LP and SACD was the increased soundstage and depth of the SACD. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. . It’s a Japanese copy of Dire Straits first lp. Tullman, Jul 31,. Myke, Dec 4, 2013. • 180 Gram Vinyl Record. The remastering has added the humanity and warmth Mozart requires. The Rhino and Audio Fidelity releases are the same mix, but different masterings. Stereophile SACD test Hi everybody, I've just joined this forum after reading this thread on the Stereophile test. SACD has a higher bit rate and uses a different encoding method from Vinyl to capture and reproduce more audio information. #5. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. 10/disc royalty for CDs. Also, I know that SACD didn't really catch on, but I see. 4. SACD disc and the DSD encoding (on a SACD) are a "frozen in time" tech circa 2005. With a storage capacity of 4. Location: KC Chiefs Kingdom. 00. (1993 Sony Japan SRCS-6827) Pearl Jam-Yield (1998 Epic Vinyl E 68164) Pink Floyd-The Dark Side Of The Moon (1983 Toshiba Japan Black Triangle De Emph CP35-3017) Pink Floyd-The Dark Side Of The Moon (1993 EMI 20th Anniv 0777 7 81479 2 3) Pink Floyd-The Dark Side Of The Moon (2003 EMI SACD HR 7243 582136 2 1) Pink Floyd-The Wall (D1) (2006 EMI. 5 copies of steve davis' "quality of silence" hybrid sacd from her and she sent along a cd-r of her whole published vinyl theories. Jim NBut while we're on the topic of SACD vs. SACD (white) vs Bluray (blue) The pressing quality of 2022 vinyl is not always perfect, but often a wash will solve the problem. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. I noted underneath your review of the box set that the new SHM-SACD was a flat transfer from the analogue master. The vinyl reissues of this title (box set and standalone) are revelatory. SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. Then I bought the new SACD version. I don't know which is more truthful. It's very difficult to set up a direct A/B comparison between SACD and CD. Dave Esoteric Audio Research Specialist. SACD sounds damn nice, there are LOTS of them available and new SACD's of material that interests me continue to be released. Luke theorizes that the 2003 SACD and the MFSL were sourced from an LP cutting master and that the original master mixes were used on the Biograph and GHII remasters. Add to Cart. Inner ear, May 11, 2017 #5. Two channel SACD just blew away the CD's, while hybrids were not out yet I had albums that I had both the CD and the SACD to compare. #6. The thing that I found most interesting when reviewing the first-time LP record pressing of George Harrison’s 1992 live album — called simply Live In Japan — was not the high quality, dark black, perfectly. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. I think I'll go Classic Records Vinyl at least for the first three albums, possibly "Passion" and "Us" too because those are also analog recordings also if I remember correctly. The MoFi also has surface noise,while the Abkco vinyl is near silent. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Both vinyl records and Super Audio CDs have. SACD vs. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. All titles are mastered from the original analog tapes by Bernie. vinyl superior to both? thats been conjectured. That means engineers have a much narrower range to work with when they’re mixing and mastering the audio, and the result, for the listener, is that the stereo “image” is highly constricted. By Paul Sinclair. Along with LPs, SACDs, reel-to-reel tape and other forms of high-quality audio. 10 per disc, while the royalty on a DVD-Audio disc was around four times higher. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Sex Lies And Master Tapes, Sep 16, 2022. The Royal Scam features more prominent guitar work than the prior Steely Dan album, Katy Lied, which had been the first without founding guitarist Jeff Baxter. It sounds great; a very good remastering job. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. The SACD follows quite closely behind vinyl, however it sounds more sterile even though you can hear as much detail as you can with the vinyl. Blue Note sacds), I already have records of. . Szeppelin75 Forum Resident. Thread starter mosttoysrk; Start date Sep 25, 2007; Help Support MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum:. Normally in making CD/LP comparisons from the same masters the poorer separation necessitated by the physical matrixing of the two channels into a single vinyl groove is hardly noticed, but this time it was extremely apparent. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. On September 16th Analogue Productions announced they will reissue the entire ABC/MCA Records Steely Dan catalog on SACD, and 45rpm UHQR LP, beginning November 4th with their debut album Can't Buy A Thrill, now in its 50th anniversary year. For vinyl releases, I have this pressing, a MFSL pressing and a late 70's/early 80's US pressing (which is now pretty worn) and I prefer the MFSL version. Moody Blues "Question of bal. I have to disagree with the positive remarks of the SACD's. Fourth - 45 rpm vinyl . General observations: * The Who - SHM-SACD is quite clean - I can easily move in and out of each track within each song so there is vg clarity. I have 30 year old Sony belt drive TT with a SME 3 arm and blue point cartridge vs a Sony 777ES. I don't know which is more truthful. Vinyl. I'm a vinyl lover, then DSD, then PCM. Both are also 4K UHD Blu-Ray players. Deeper fuller sound across the board. One of the fun things about this hobby is screwing around. • SHM Single Layer SACDs. One is the MFSL version which I loved. I think my buying strategy just morphed into buying a few LPs which I really want and then stocking up on the less expensive SACDs, particularly if the. Warner Music [Sony Music outside Europe] today announced the upcoming release of Pink Floyd’s ‘Animals’ on Deluxe Gatefold, CD, LP, Blu-ray and SACD. But again, I'd love to be proven wrong. Many audiophiles choose to embrace both formats, recognizing that each. Shawn, Dec 8, 2012. The initial presentation changed from relatively mechanical to one with atmosphere and naturalness. It sounds like MoFi master their vinyl and SACD separately. Not a fair comparison. According to a theorem called. 1. Thankfully my vinyl copy of that album is pristine. Just my $0. Music41 said: ↑. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Direct Stream Digital (DSD) is a trademark used by Sony and Philips for their system for digitally encoding audio signals for the Super Audio CD (SACD). 2. If the system is highly resolving there is a considerable and sometimes overwhelming difference. I own the SHM-CDs of all the early Steely Dan albums ( Can't Buy A Trill through Gaucho) and I'm more than pleased with the fidelity of these issues. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. They all sound good but the SACD is sublime. SACD, to me, just doesn't sound real, life-like, or true. my system, SACD sounds better than DVD-A, because I'm playing SACDs on a Sony AX777ES, and playing DVD-As on a Yamaha DVD-S1200. You can remain judicious in selecting your choices. Analog sources- CD vs. The separation between the left and right channels on vinyl is 30dB, compared to digital files, which exceed 90 dB. However, I have tested the EQ of my cartridge and phono stage and in all the following examples, that EQ has been reversed out of the vinyl samples so that what we're comparing is the true EQ of what's in the LP groove. although DVD-Audio does sound great too. I agree with you about surface noise. By Kimo January 22, 2012 in General Forum. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. It’s appalling the crap they’re releasing to kids these days…As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $. sacd superior to rbcd Login / RegisterAllowing for the quality of the youtube audio , that is pretty much what you would expect to hear from those 3 different masters and Its not really fair to say its a CD vs SACD vs Vinyl thing. I run through a comparison review about this subject today. The 777ES does not perform at its best upon power-on. SACD (1999) uses completely different 1-Bit method of encoding so it is hard to extrapolate, but best guess, SACD is about. It sounds manipulated and phony. Then I bought the new SACD version. Sep 23, 2022. The MFSL SACD I could tell immediately that it didn't hold a candle to the MFSL 2-45 issue, or I think even the MOV mono pressing. Please login or register an accountlogin or register an accountSACD vs CD-do you listen and compare SACD/CD layers on your discs? Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by BSC, Apr 13, 2015. Vinyl. We do plan on releasing a limited run of virgin vinyl 45rpm pressings—probably 500 pieces—sometime next month if we’re able. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Analog Format. Then I bought the new SACD version. Sponsor NewsMini-meet Shootout: AKG K1000 vs. Half-speed mastered at Abbey Road Studios and pressed on 180g audiophile vinyl. The curve below compares the spectra of vinyl and SACD. The SACD features the 2018 remix of the iconic 1977 Pink Floyd album for the first time, by long-time producer/engineer James Guthrie. or Add to Wishlist. I don't know which is more truthful. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. SHM-SACD vs Original LP/Original LP-rip, Original CD and other reissues. Home. That old mix was reissued on SACD by Audio Fidelity in 2015, and then it was issued again on Blu-Ray by Rhino in 2017. I wrote I was somewhat pleased with the mastering. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. The presence of the CD layer shouldn't affect at all (at least in principle) the reading of the SACD layer. I guess you have to love old music to appreciate DSD, since that's about all that's represented. SACD debate, there is no definitive answer to which format offers the ultimate listening experience. . It. If the OP wastes money on those with no SACD player, then he wastes money. One is the MFSL version which I loved. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. I did a similar shoot out to yours above with the sax and vocal section at the end of Avalon with the SACD and UK first press vinyl. Just for kicks I decided to compare Side A of the Speakers Corner vinyl to the same corresponding songs on the JSACD. If it's a choice between vinyl and SACD in headphones, then most people with any sort of budget will almost certainly pick SACD. The 2003 hybrid SACD and the MFSL feature the original mix, but they have inferior sound to the JWH tracks which appear on. Once you listen to the unbelievable sound of the grandfather clock chiming you. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. If it's a hi-res source of unknown origin it will simply say "HR". I like both; but am buying more hi-q vinyl than SACD, DVD-A, or HDCD simply because remastered 180g vinyl is easier to find in the genres I listen to: Rock, alt-rock, blues, some jazz, and oldies. #3. However, I have tested the EQ of my cartridge and phono stage and in all the following examples, that EQ has been reversed out of the vinyl samples so that what we're comparing is the true EQ of what's in the LP groove. Oh and if you like SACDs, most of the masters were made on digital audio workstations that are PCM. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by swinger, Mar 2, 2004. Moody Blues "Question of bal. Well, the NS500V has been burning in for about 60 hours now (the SACD demo disk on infinite repeat), so I figured I'd do a comparison to our aging. deeper, wider sound field. The choice between the two depends on personal preferences and the desired sonic attributes. Both vinyl records and Super Audio CDs have their merits and drawbacks, and the choice ultimately comes down to personal taste and priorities. he worst is shelling out $25 or $30 for either and after a long search and sometimes a long wait for import or re-pressing, the thing sounds. The latest in this long history is a double-blind test that, the authors conclude, demonstrates that 44. As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $. IMHO. 98: Grateful Dead / Workingman's Dead Hybrid Stereo SACD Numbered Limited Edition CMOB 2137 SA Original Price: $29. But when I find an album that is available in SACD vs Vinyl----SACD 90% of the time, unless the LP is a collectors items and LTD edition. Don't want to spend a lot of money, maybe I will not like them. On the other hand, at least to my ears, the bass lines are noticeably subdued on the 2012 SACD compared with the 2002 redbook CD. It might not bother some people though. There were two Marantz SACD players I was keeping my eye on: the 30n ($2999) and the SA-KI Ruby Signature player with DAC ($3999). Steely Dan-Cant Buy A Thrill-Hybrid Stereo SACD|Acoustic Sounds. Which format do you like the most, or find to be the closest to the original master tapes? Or, if you attend live concerts (or play and instrument), which format do you prefer and why? wenterprisesnw 02-04-2000 7:53pm. . Both needed to be set up properly and tracked at their maximum rated vertical tracking force. Get either the target Morrison Hotel CD or the Audio Fidelity. Blows them all away with more full body richness. Even on masterings I'm not all that happy with, the deep soundstage is there. A Secret Lab. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. If that makes sense. Slight increase in frequency range and they also have a lot more features on the Blu-ray disc that are fun to play with. This is the average EQ of the first track, Tears of. There’s no shortage of non audiophile hybrid disks that are $35+ vs. Moody Blues "Question of bal. That leaves Soft Parade which also was released by Audio Fidelity. Roxanne Joncas Soundstage determines the stereo image width you perceive between the speakers. . A Secret Lab. swinger Member Thread Starter. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. It lacks the deep bass of the Abkco pressing but sounds so much more "vivid" and real. It's ok if you like 'that' sound. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. well i'd say you have to take it on a title by title basis with SACD, as with any medium source and mastering are key. SACD obviously has an advantage on portability and probably overall SQ - but that's still subjective as I might enjoy the "colorization" of vinyl more. It has long been believed that the human ear cannot hear frequencies above 22 kHz. I was a teen in the 60's and don't remember them sounding this bad. I will add this is one album I prefer listening to on CD (the MFSL release) or especially SACD vs vinyl so take my opinion with a grain of salt. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Endymion, Apr 22, 2015. The better sounding recordings any given record company are the one's chosen for SACD release. In the vinyl vs. I don't know which is more truthful. 02. Vinyl. . • The first international release of the recording on Hybrid SACDs, allowing listeners to hear the enhanced resolution of these new transfers and playable on all CD players • The first and only complete Wagner Ring cycle available in Dolby Atmos Channel separation. . I’ll explain in a minute, but first I want to make sure we know what the SACD format is, and what makes it different from a standard compact disc. During the summer I don't get much seat time in front of the stereo so it might be a week or more before my next chance. I am not sure if it is a great. Id agree with the guy about the old cd and sacd not being *that* much different other than a bit more resolution. #20. A well-done SACD can sound incredible and can give more detail than an LP. SACD vs. SACD players have a 8 to 10 second delay as they switch layers and the mastering can be different on different layers, even on the same hybrid SACD. Often times, the. Whether is was done 15-20-30 years ago or today. One is the MFSL version which I loved. Midrange is sweet. . MikeT, Nov 3, 2019. It was released on two formats: On vinyl record, as an Ultradisc ‘One-Step’ Limited Edition 33⅓ rpm LP, pressed on Neotech’s Super Vinyl™ contained in a commemorative slip box, (and), on CD, as a single Ultradisc 'UHR' Super Audio Compact Disc (SACD) contained in a gatefold card sleeve. in May of 1967, one week before Sgt. I can hear the difference between CD and vinyl, and between CD quality and high-def audio. But when I compare the same piece issued both on SACD and vinyl (Channel Records, Pentatone), SACD carries the day by a whisker: a touch airier, a slightly truer tone and yes, an even better “flow” that facilitate following the musical argument. The Analogue Productions SACD of Pink Floyd ‘s The Dark Side of the Moon is finally shipping after a long wait. SACD debate, there is no definitive answer to which format offers the ultimate listening experience. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. Probably the highest quality classical recording I own. 2. SACD vs. Boy, what a difference. The SACD is wonderful sounding reworking, giving the very believable and acceptable illusion that the original recording was pretty good. The MoFi absolutely kills the Sony. The vinyl appears to be analogue mastered so if you value an all-analogue chain that would be an advantage. Location: West Hollywood, CA and Inverness, IL. Hello everybody. When it comes to listening to music, there are two main formats that audiophiles swear by: SACD players and vinyl. The album features classics such as "Spanish Castle Magic," "Little Wing," "Castles Made Of Sand,". bmpnyc. By meatballz August 2, 2011 in General Hi-Fi Discussion. The SACD is wonderful sounding reworking, giving the very believable and acceptable illusion that the original recording was pretty good. The vocals are real, the acoustic guitars are EQ'd perfectly. I first got into Dylan right before all the Sony Sacds came out, and bought them all up. With respect to SACD vs. Consequently, the Super Audio CD (SACD) was developed by Philips and Sony. The first was, that the vinyl was on the same transparency level but more organic sounding, the second was, that the SACD was clearly more transparent sounding, which overruled other differences. Location: United States. although I get the impression they just don’t put the same effort into the SACD release. The band's incendiary…I agree to a point, but "everything matters" and adding an well built, linear power supply to my source made a subtle but very, very noticeable improvement as did cableing, power cables, isolation, etc. Dynamics are out of this world. tlake6659 said: ↑. It ain't dead to me at all, thanks in no small part to our host. However, we find a significant variation of the levels of the top of the spectrum (above 15 kHz) due to an equalization or to the burning head (red zone). In other forum in Madrid we have carried out the test with the Stereophile material and I'm anxious to know if yo have done the same overhere and what results you have obtained. In. In the end it really comes down to the transfer and the mastering. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The band did NOT like it at all. Search titles only By:Zucchero "Sugar" Fornaciari - Miserere (Overture)1.